It's Mother's Day 2002 in
America.
And no one has birthed and nurtured new Arab-Jewish
relationships better or faster than Brooklyn's Marcia Kannry
(Marcia@thedialogueproject.org). Yet, she'd be quick to also credit other
women and men there -- her Dialogue partners.
For Palestinians and Jews In New York -- Brooklyn,
Queens, Manhattan -- The Dialogue Project is the flowering of this one woman's
dream.
Group participants appeared on WNYC-Radio to talk
about the essence of Dialogue. You can hear their two broadcasts on The
Dialogue Project Web site:
http://www.thedialogueproject.org/listen.htm
More about their people, challenges, and breakthroughs
are in the article below.
It is never too soon -- or too late -- to begin
building relationships. They are the foundation for our Life
ahead.
-- L&L
===================
Published in The Jewish Weekly -- Serving the Jewish Community of Greater New
York
Friday, May 10, 2002
http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=6144
Talking With 'The Enemy'
Fledgling Jewish-Arab dialogue struggles through intifada's violent
reality.
Debra Nussbaum Cohen
Staff Writer
After listening to news accounts of Palestinian
homicide bombers and Israel's military response, Eddy Ehrlich feels ready
"to explode."
Then Ehrlich, a self-described political centrist,
goes to his monthly Jewish-Arab dialogue circle and comes away feeling like a
changed man.
"Thirty souls have opened up and the humanity
flows," Ehrlich says. "I go out so relieved."
Bassam Amin, a Palestinian living in Brooklyn, had to
force himself to go to his most recent dialogue group. Israeli soldiers
on a Ramallah street had recently shot to death one of his cousins, a mentally
disabled man, he says. Amin, who spent the first half of his life in Kfar
Malek, near Ramallah, says he now has nightmares about Israeli soldiers coming
to his door in the middle of the night, dragging him out, naked, into the
street.
"I have to challenge myself to sit across this
table and speak about peace" while feeling so angry, he says
At the same time, Amin struggles to teach his
6-year-old son to eschew hatred. "This is a huge dilemma for me, to
explain the destruction to my son. I try to explain to him that not all
Israelis are bad, that not all Jews are bad."
Ehrlich and Amin are both part of a fledgling network,
The Dialogue Project. At a recent session, in the back room of a Brooklyn
Middle Eastern restaurant, a small group of Jews, Muslims and Christians,
including Israelis and Palestinians, engaged in one of today's thorniest - and
most elusive - endeavors: talking to "the enemy."
Their dialogue grew passionate, even heated, but with
great effort remained respectful. Afterward, conversation was animated as
participants caught up on each others' personal lives while scooping up hummus
and salad with warm pita.
"This is not a feel-good touchy-feely
thing," says Marcia Kannry, founder of The Dialogue Project.
"But the news is pushing us along to keep it up."
The idea first occurred to her after she found herself
overwhelmed by grief in September 2000, when Israel's now-Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon took a walk on Jerusalem's Temple Mount and violence let loose in the
start of the current intifada.
Says Kannry, who had lived in Israel as a regional
director for the Jewish National Fund, "My choice was to stay in bed and
moan, or figure out a way in my own community to confront this."
So she began talking with Palestinian shopkeepers in
Park Slope and Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, where she does her errands, and with school
administrators at area schools with large Arab student bodies.
About 14 months ago, she started to organize her new
network into dialogue groups.
Result: three dialogue circles, each with 15 to 30
participants, two in Brooklyn and one on the Upper West Side. Four more -
in Brooklyn, Manhattan, Riverdale and New Jersey - are in formation.
Each dialogue circle meets once a month for several
hours, led by a facilitator. Kannry tries to balance participation
between Jews, Muslims and Arabs, with non-Arab Christians involved as
"supportive others," but says it's much easier to get Jews involved
than Arabs.
About 800 people of the 1,100-plus on a dialogue
circle waiting list are Jews, she says.
"People know that their passions run high, and
that they want to be polite. Those from Muslim communities are not used
to speaking in a circle. They're not therapist-oriented like we
are," she says.
The currently explosive level of tension around
Israeli-Palestinian issues makes the work of The Dialogue Project more
difficult - and even more compelling.
"Many ongoing participants haven't wanted to come
because they feel so angry," says Kannry. "The feeling is, 'The
fire is burning. Why are we talking about picking up the hose rather than
actually picking it up?' "
At the dialogues she says, "You can feel people
palpitating with rage but nonetheless following the guidelines" that are
part of the project.
And they persevere.
"I come in wanting to explode but have to pick
the one thing I can talk about, and then listen to 29 other people," said
Ehrlich, who participates in the Park Slope dialogue circle and works as an
occupational therapist. Two of his brothers live in Israel - one on a
kibbutz, the other in Efrat.
There are a few other similar efforts in
existence.
According to the Web site Middle East Web (www.mideastweb. org),
nine groups meet in other parts of the U.S., from San Francisco to Orange
County, Calif., from Duluth, Minn., to Charlottesville, Va.
There are nine more in Israel and the Palestinian
territories through peace-making organizations there, three in Europe, and five
that exist only in cyberspace.
The Dialogue Project's circle discussions maintain
clear guidelines: The purpose is dialogue, not debate. Meetings begin
with a classic conflict resolution exercise: mirroring. People pair off
to share their perspectives on a particular topic for a few minutes. Then
the circle comes back together as partners synopsize each others' stories for
the group.
Then participants start to discuss a specific theme,
trying to stick to statements that begin "I feel" One month the topic
might, for example, be current events. At this month's meeting of the
Park Slope Dialogue, held Sunday at the Ethical Culture center, it was the
Holocaust.
Through the process members say they begin to know
"the other."
"I better understand the Israeli obsession with
security and defending themselves," says Diane Chehab, a Christian
Lebanese-American who still has family in Beirut. "Being able to
listen in a better way, I now understand what they're talking about, even if I
don't agree."
One evening before a recent meeting, several dialogue
members joined other interested people in a visit to El Maqdies Mosque, in Bay
Ridge. It marked the first time that the mosque, which attracts Sunni
Muslims from different ethnic backgrounds, had hosted Jews. A reciprocal
trip to a Brooklyn synagogue is being planned.
And it was the first time that most of the Jews had
been in a mosque.
"I was actually scared," says Alexander Gonenne, an American Jew
whose father and stepsiblings live in Israel. "As soon as prayers
began, I felt frightened. I tend to associate the prayers with a negative
connotation, based on my experience in Israel."
Bassam Amin, the Palestinian Muslim pharmacist who
works in downtown Brooklyn, says, "The call to prayer is not a call to
war."
Says Benny Davidovitch, an Israeli who has lived in
the U.S. for the past year and works as a physicist, "it's very hard
to hear" strong critiques of Israel. "I feel very sorry and
guilty. I feel confusion, because this is about my survival. It's
my family's life, my friends' life."
Eddy Ehrlich, of the Park Slope circle, says that
"there isn't equity" in his group. "Jews are being asked
to examine what evils they have perpetrated, and that question isn't being
asked of the Palestinians," he says.
Part of the problem may be the inherent bias that
stems from self-selection.
Most of the Arab participants are
"non-radical," Ehrlich says; most of the Jewish participants see
themselves on the liberal-left of the political spectrum.
Ehrlich calls himself "a pragmatist, somewhere in
the generally silent middle." He says he is the only Jewish participant
who, while introducing himself during a dialogue, describes himself as a
Zionist.
"I end up feeling like I have to represent the
part of the spectrum that isn't there. At the last meeting there was
justifying of suicide bombers. To me, it was a real problem that there
was a lack of historical context, and a lack of religious context" in
understanding the Jewish connection to Israel.
"The idea that is convenient for Arabs to latch
on to is that the Holocaust is the reason for the creation of the State of
Israel," he says.
So then "why go?" Ehrlich asks
rhetorically. "What choice do I have? The alternatives suck.
"The choices are to yell at the radio or to get
together with close-minded Jews, pat each other on the back and feel sorrowful
or justified.
"I do it," he says, "to invest in a
future that's grounded in reality, in a reality that recognizes the
other. It matters how we behave now, while we wait to see what
happens.
"It's better to be angry up close than hating
from afar." n
For more information, look at http://www.thedialogueproject.org, write to
marcia@thedialogueproject.org, or phone Thomas Cox at (718) 965-3830.